Tuesday, June 14, 2011

More replay in baseball would have prevented last night's fiasco in Tigers, Rays game

Until recent years, I had not been one to clamor for extensive replay in baseball. Yet, it does seem like blatantly blown calls are becoming an epidemic that would be solved by it.
The latest was Monday night when umpire John Tumpane obviously missed a call on a play at the plate during the Tigers-Rays game at Comerica Park. The Rays Justin Ruggiano did score, but was nonetheless called out. The replays were very definitive. It was 1-0 at the time in the seventh inning of a game between two competitive and contending teams with the pennant race heating up in June.
The replays were also conclusive on the Tigers' last home stand when they were greatly aided in a victory over the Twins by a ball that went into the stands, bounced off a fan and back onto the field. Yet, it wasn't called a ground rule double, allowing Jhonny Peralta to score the winning run from third base.
Then again, the calls aren't getting much notice in this town because they went for the home team. That does not make it right. Not anymore right than when Armando Galarraga was robbed of his perfect game last season by Jim Joyce's missed call.
Baseball games last long enough. I get that part. But one challenge flag per game might work without making games drag on.
The cost would be worth it in maintaining the integrity of the game, which is getting compromised by wrong calls deciding games - and perhaps, ultimately, pennant races - during an era when replays do show every mistake.

10 Comments:

Blogger elset said...

"But one challenge flag per game might work..."

I don't like this idea, with limited challenges. I don't like it in football and I wouldn't like it in baseball. The point of replay should be to get ALL the calls right. I think it's absurd that it's setup to get the first call right. If there's another bad call, too bad, you already used your challenge.

Do it like the NHL. Have someone in the booth looking at every play and if it's close, take a look.

12:14 PM 
Blogger Fred Brill said...

Pat,

I must have replayed that play at the plate 20 times - and I really believe that the ump saw Avila tag Ruggiano on the first swipe catching his cleat as the foot was blocked by Avila - not the second one where avila simply came down on the foot clearly resting on the plate.

If instant replay were to be instituted - it would have to be just that - INSTANT - and up to the umps discretion to review the call - not by the demand of a screaming manager.

Speaking of screaming Managers - you didn't have to be a lip reader to understand every word Joe Madden was screaming at Tumpane!

12:26 PM 
Anonymous Michael C said...

Agreed, Pat. They need to do something. A call down from the booth, or maybe one challenge flag and then you get another if you're challenge was successful, would be a major improvement.

2:39 PM 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Agree but we're dealing with King Selig, who was responsible for putting his head in the sand during the steroid debacle to revive the game's (owners) revenue.

Also the MLB Umpires Association. By the way, those guys are really pretty good.

There are a lot of ways to shorten games. Don Drysdale and Bob Gibson had a way to stop hitters from backing out at the last second. It's called chin music. And that's when these prima donnas didn't have batting gloves.

5:30 PM 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Book,

Just a potential inconsistency in your take here.

Last year, I mentioned that they should have retroactively given Galarraga his perfect game, and you nixed that idea. I get that it would have been against the rules, but it would have been fair and correct, and was the last play of the game so it wouldn't have changed the outcome.

I'd go for instant replay in baseball, but they have to do something to speed up the games first. That game the other night was gruesomely long. I don't buy Leland's comment that game length shouldn't matter, especially because I think it hurts his team when his pitcher is molasses slow. They should all want to work like Verlander. They'd play sharper. Look at that Cleveland closer. He's lightning quick.

8:16 PM 
Blogger Pat Caputo said...

elset,
You make a fair point. And I will say this for the NHL's system, it is usually pretty obvious when they should go to the replay - and most of the time they are quick to come to a decision.
Caputo

3:42 PM 
Blogger Pat Caputo said...

Fred Brill,
I love you, and you know that, but you need to get your eyes checked. My eyes are bad, but even I could see Avila didn't come close to tagging him.
Caputo

3:43 PM 
Blogger Pat Caputo said...

Michael C,
Seems like some sort of system is a small price to pay to get it right.
Caputo

3:44 PM 
Blogger Pat Caputo said...

Anonymous,
Rather than look at replay as an insult, umpires should see it as a vehicle that takes unfair pressure off them.
Caputo

3:45 PM 
Blogger Pat Caputo said...

Anonymous,
Actually, I called for replay after the Galarraga-Joyce thing

3:48 PM 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home